THE FADE.....................

Make your choice, or suffer

Welp, there goes 98% of Emory's playbook.

how about limit it? once per game

Mrhardbody201 wrote:

how about limit it? once per game

no

Ban it for the good of the league!

looks like chi and dukebball the only voters so far

I got faded by chi for two touchdowns first game of the season!

Can we ban other overpowered things too?

ban guys who user catch then?

i was gonna say ban sugar blitz

ban guys who are too good?

so much in this thread

Ban canadians?

ban people who pass

Ban anyone who's gamertag isn't Millerguy123?

What's wrong with user catching? And how's that relevant to a nearly unstoppable fade that the CPU does itself?

I agree the fade is worse. But I don't think it's out of the question to compare the two..especially some of the cases where people switch pull off the route then either come around to get some gay animation, or run out of bounds then back in to cut off the route etc.

And the sugar blitz...yeah that should probably go too. Who at EA had the idea to line both linebackers up at the line?

Fooath wrote:

I agree the fade is worse. But I don't think it's out of the question to compare the two..especially some of the cases where people switch pull off the route then either come around to get some gay animation, or run out of bounds then back in to cut off the route etc.

And the sugar blitz...yeah that should probably go too. Who at EA had the idea to line both linebackers up at the line?

tl;dr : waa i cant stop suga blitz and usa cach so i gotta cry to ban it

as far as banning the "Fade", im assuming you guys are meaning when the QB throws the high ball and results in the WR doing a jump ball.....then yes, i say BAN THE FUCK out of that. No skill in that AT ALL

Banning the sugar blitz? i disagree with that. If the play is designed to blitz the way it does, and the offense cant stop it, then thats the offense's fault. Doing other manual bull before the snap for the sugar blitz to get instant pressure, then yeah ban it.

Fooath wrote:

I agree the fade is worse. But I don't think it's out of the question to compare the two..especially some of the cases where people switch pull off the route then either come around to get some gay animation, or run out of bounds then back in to cut off the route etc.

And the sugar blitz...yeah that should probably go too. Who at EA had the idea to line both linebackers up at the line?

Okay, I get what you mean, and I do agree to an extent. Some people user catch with turning animations that just pushes CBs out of the way, when you're in position for a deflection or a pick. But it's such a hard thing to rule on, as far as who is abusing what.

RyanPelley wrote:

Fooath wrote:

I agree the fade is worse. But I don't think it's out of the question to compare the two..especially some of the cases where people switch pull off the route then either come around to get some gay animation, or run out of bounds then back in to cut off the route etc.

And the sugar blitz...yeah that should probably go too. Who at EA had the idea to line both linebackers up at the line?

Okay, I get what you mean, and I do agree to an extent. Some people user catch with turning animations that just pushes CBs out of the way, when you're in position for a deflection or a pick. But it's such a hard thing to rule on, as far as who is abusing what.

the only thing that would work is if multiple people say the same thing you get punished. 3 strike system?

just ban the faggoty ass fade for now. Never going to do anything about user catching. It's how rings are won.

how about ban whiners like fooath and call it a day

Fades take no skill. It is a glitch in the game, you can't stop it. Nothing else needs to be banned.

^ thats the non soft dbake333 i remember

Someone's getting a little testy having his only scoring play taken away.